Jack Mallory
I come out of the gym to discover that, once again, I AM A WINNER!
Sometimes when I post a reference to Trumpublicanan lies, I make myself a bet that one response will be a regurgitation of prior political prevarications--I expect the stock mantra of "emails, Benghazi, Monica, blah, blah, blah." If I win, I get to buy a bottle of Single Malt; if I lose, I have to invest the same amount in a donation to Trump 2020.
Today, I won not only the bottle of Single Malt, but awarded myself a pint of Jameson's as well: not just reference to Billary, but Brazille (sic), Obama, Rather, Reid, NIxon, and Christie! If Nora had managed to fit LBJ and Dubya in, mined the extensive fields of FDR's prevaricating without apologizing, I'd buy myself a case of Bohemia as well.
Were we to "Wake up!" what would we realize that, in our slumbers, we are unaware of? Is Nora telling us that the apology-free lies of politicians in the past invalidate mention of the lies of the current president? Or do those lies justify the lies of So-called? Because (won't repeat the list) others have lied in the past, it's OK that he lies to us in the present? Or is it just that their failures to apologize for lies excuse his failures?
This philosophy, to use the term loosely (actually, "little kid crap" seems more accurate), would certainly benefit politicians; I'm not sure it would be good for the nation and its citizens. Could you expand on your argument, clarify these things for us, Nora? Because you can list, or allege, the lies of others is it OK for the Trumpublicans to lie without apologizing, or should we just not mention it?
Some of you are perhaps wondering what I do with my Single Malt and Jameson's, as a non-drinker. Well, these are imaginary stakes in the bet. I allow myself to imagine sipping something very expensive, and very smoky. Just like I imagine sending the donation to Trump if I lose the bet. Actually, I'm not sure I've ever lost.
**************
Glen--some dietary information from the WaPo (sorry, Nora, I tried to find the Breitbart version of the story but without any luck. The Tsimane maybe too liberal for Breitbart coverage.). If you read all the way to the end you might get some ideas about changing your lifestyle--how'd you like to come out of retirement, fish for piranhas, hunt monkeys?--but you'll also find out about the taste differences between Capuchin monkeys and Howlers. Neither seem to taste like chicken.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/03/17/these-people-eat-monkeys-and-piranhas-they-also-have-the-lowest-rates-of-heart-disease-ever-measured/?utm_term=.11a0060c839e
****************
And an article from The New Yorker, about 10 million dollars worth of punctuation. Miss Gould and Miss Casey would say, "We told you so!"
http://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/a-few-words-about-that-ten-million-dollar-serial-comma?mbid=nl_170318_Daily&CNDID=38880454&spMailingID=10645375&spUserID=MTMzMTg0NTI5MjY5S0&spJobID=1121406583&spReportId=MTEyMTQwNjU4MwS2
|