Nora Skinker (Morton)
Ahoy, classmates! Happily enjoying your comments re fall colors, art exhibits, Ms. Baez, culinary delights and such! Before expounding on issues, let me recommend going up to Cooperstown, NY during the fall color season. Of course, a preliminary requisite might be the desire to visit The Baseball Hall of Fame tucked within the breathtakingly beautiful, Rockwellian little town. You will need two full days to explore it and believe me, it is not only interesting as heck but absolutely entertaining as well. Stay at a cute little B&B and eat at Nicoletta's, a culinary treasure in town. Both requiring reservations of course. We went the first week in November and thought the colors couldn't possibly be more intense.
Helen, was happy to see that you disagreed with ALL points I briefly mentioned in my most recent post: if, in fact, you do disagree with each point, please share with me (and all) what YOU might recommend we do to stop China from being the cheating trading partner they are (and have been) for so many decades. I greatly anticipate your response, since I think it's a painful time for our country during this tariff "squeeze" and would love to incorporate a Plan B to get to the long-term goal, without these sacrificial days preceding (hopefully) a beneficial deal. The forum is the perfect platform to put those ideas out there and talk about them!
As a second point: the noble endeavor, yet precipitous drawdown of Afghanistan (with which you and Jack apparently agree), seems pretty scary, given the premature decision made by Obama in 2011(against miliitary advice) to pull out of Iraq which signalled the rise of ISIS. It is my understanding that, though drawing down a few thousand US troops is prudent (albeit political), allowing our presence to fall below 8500 troops or so, would be to risk the region becoming a sanctuary for terrorism and therefore result in the rise of ISIS and al-Qaida. That has been the pattern - part and parcel - of the Afghan history. According to Graham, etal., it would be disastrous to outsource our national security to the Taliban, admitting that, though a deal might be struck with the Taliban, it would not be enough to fight the Islamic State terrorist group and al-Qaida in the region. Assurances and guarantees for our complete security? Of course not - no more than taking air rifles out of American hands will insure the end of murders - but nonetheless, it seems prudent to go slowly rather than completely withdraw and leave an immediate vacuum to be filled by the bad guys. And all one needs do is read Nonie Darwish's books re living under the Taliban to know that they are untrustworthy and exceedingly bad guys, too. (Btw, It may help to know that Graham is preparing legislation that would require the secretaries of Defense and State to certify to Congress that reduction of troop levels to below 8,600 would not create an additional national security risk for the homeland). Yes, we are beyond weary of long standing wars, but as long as we are hated and hunted and threatened, we must be smart and not think radical Islam has changed its ideology one iota against the West. No?
I assume that Bill Maher's hateful rhetoric re David Koch was ok with Helen and Jack, as well? Interestingly, Mr. Koch gave $150M to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in 2015 which happens to be where RBG had her surgery (treatment to remove her pancreatic cancer) recently. One might assume Mr. Maher is thrilled with the Justice's recovery but not so much with the fact that Mr. Koch's money helped save her. Sadly, his stinging retort upon Mr. Koch's death says nothing about the character of David Koch but everything about the character of Bill Maher. JMHO.
Jack, I fail to see how advocating a hopeful, new, FDA approved drug to veterans who have not previously responded to adequate trials of the available treatments for major depression, is a bad thing. Why is recommending such a drug overlooking "the fundamental complexity of depression and to miss the root causes of the disease"? Are they somehow mutually exclusive? It would seem to me that bringing public attention to the need alone, is a good thing. And, if the drug only yielded benefits from 1 in 3 trials, how does that eliminate ANY success for those who may need it? My stage 4 sister lived two extra, unpredicted years of quality life after entering and qualifying for an unlikely cancer trial offered by Johns Hopkins Hospital in 2014. Trials are trials but often they are better than nothing. Or is the large company Johnson&Johnson somehow to blame? Please explain.
And finally, since we're all for better border security, aren't we happy to see 60 more miles of wall security?
|