Jack Mallory
Trump's revelation of highly classified information has not been "debunked," as of this morning. The original Washington Post story has been separately confirmed by the NYT, Wall Street Journal, Buzz-feed, CNN, and Reuters.
McMaster has issued a classic Washington non-denial denial. He says sources and methods were not discussed. He in no way denies that Trump gave the sensitive information, collected by a US ally, to the Russians. The disclosure was specific enough to help the Russians determine where it came from, one of many reason one DOESN'T blab classified information to less-than-friendly parties.
As Republican Sen. Corker said, “To compromise a source is something that you just don’t do, and that’s why we keep the information that we get from intelligence sources so close as to prevent that from happening."
The information given to the Russians is categorized as "Code Word," a level above Top Secret (perhaps the equivalent of Top Secret Crypto, from my era of security clearance?).
And this from a president whose campaign featured the "Lock her up" chant referring to his opponent's alleged security breaches.
"Crooked Hillary Clinton and her team "were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information." Not fit!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 6, 2016"
Not fit?
A more in-depth article on the security implications of the breach in the non-partisan national security blog, Lawfare: https://lawfareblog.com/bombshell-initial-thoughts-washington-posts-game-changing-story
***************
Weather has broken, kayak on the car. Outa here!
|