Jack Mallory
Glen--can't blame our behavior on our genes. Like all critters, we have hard wiring. But our hard wiring allows and encourages an enormous range of behavior, from really "good" to really "bad." But genes don't know good from bad, only reproductively advantageous or disadvantageous. We're wired to be both very competitive and very cooperative; really nice to each other and really shitty. Often we cooperate to compete. We can look at our fear of strangers as irrational xenophobia, or as behavior protective of our family or group. When the bad guys are at the door, xenophobia can be "good!"
On the other hand, when you've been xenophobic with your neighbors, but you need a handout 'cuz your crops failed, xenophobia don't look like such a great strategy!
Similarly, being aggressive and domineering can make a person a real asshole. On the other hand, if you're looking someone to lead your war party (offensive or defensive) maybe that's who you want. But, was Patton any better a general than Eisenower?
Point is, our behavior involves possibilities and choices, not orders from the Genemaster. It's actually much harder this way--we get to choose, but we're responsible for our choices!
Forgot to post the link to Mexico offers to pay for Trump’s impeachment: http://blog.timesunion.com/davidkalish/mexico-offers-to-pay-for-trumps-impeachment-instead-of-border-wall/2706/
It's a sad statement when writers have to post a "(This is a work of satire)" with their satire, because many readers can't tell real news from fake news from satire. Imagine: Catch 22, by Joseph Heller (A Work of Satire). Maybe there should be some form of literacy test before people are given access to written text. That's sarcastic humor, not a serious suggestion.
And this, also from earlier today:
|